Germany is preparing for the visit of Ahmed Al Sharaa: armed groups associated with him are attacking Christian Syriacs in the vicinity of Hama (Syria).
In the city of Al-Suqaylabiyah, pressure on the Christian Syriacs is steadily increasing. Armed groups linked to Ahmed Al Sharaa have intensified their attacks.
According to information from the region, these actors are not limited to external groups but also include elements of the local population in connection with existing security structures. This overlap significantly undermines trust in state protection mechanisms.
Reports indicate that these groups have entered the city and vandalized shops, including beverage stores, cafés, restaurants, grocery stores, and clothing shops. Civilians have been subjected to armed attacks, while harassment of women continues.
Residents report that security forces have either failed to intervene or were partially involved, while complaints have gone unaddressed.
These developments highlight a central issue: when state or state-affiliated security structures fail to provide reliable protection, affected communities are compelled to establish their own security mechanisms.
The situation represents a serious threat to the local population as well as to ethnic and religious communities. It forms part of a broader pattern of incidents since Al Sharaa’s rise to power, reinforcing the perception of increasing systematic pressure on the Syriacs.
The Christian Syriacs in the region are known for their clear vision of a pluralistic and stable future for Syria. This commitment is increasingly perceived as a factor behind targeted intimidation attempts.
In the shadow of regional tensions—particularly in the context of the Iran conflict—these developments receive insufficient attention.
At the same time, Germany is increasingly discussing the return of Syrian refugees. This debate must be grounded in the realities on the ground. Who can realistically return to a Syria where parts of the population are exposed to targeted pressure, insecurity, and marginalization?
For many Syrians—especially Christian Syriacs—such conditions do not constitute a safe or dignified environment for return. A sustainable return policy requires credible guarantees of security, equal rights, and social acceptance.
Against this backdrop, the visit of Ahmed Al Sharaa takes on additional political significance. Any cooperation or support measures should be tied to clear expectations: protection of civilians, adherence to the rule of law, and recognition of all components of Syrian society.
This includes in particular the Christian Syriacs as an integral part of Syria’s historical and cultural identity. Their recognition and inclusion are key benchmarks for a credible future of the country.
If Germany is seriously considering refugee returns, the responsible actors must meet standards compatible with German principles: security, accountability, and equal rights for all citizens.
Syria’s future will depend on whether all people can live in dignity and safety. Developments such as those in Al-Suqaylabiyah call this into question and must be taken into account in political decision-making.
Reel on facebook: https://www.facebook.com/reel/1438526097265483
Message on X: https://x.com/esu_int/status/2037792796464009650